Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Fwd: Health and Safety Hazards caused by AHUs

EXISTING AHU.in closed room at basement parking.2

EXISTING.AHU in closed room at basement parking
Higher Capacity.AHU.ready for installation at C-3 gate basement entry
Ducting hanging at 6.5 feets at basement parking


AHU.ready for installation near C-2 gate exit

AHU.ready for installation near C-2 gate exit


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: subir chopra <choprasubir@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:34 AM
Subject: Health and Safety Hazards caused by AHUs
To: srorwa@gmail.com


We all are aware of the fact that very soon two AHU will start functioning from our basement parking.

There are many Health and safety hazards caused by these units that includes fungal & bacterial infections along-with Fire.

Few of them are mentioned below;

To prevent fire hazard there has to be a automatic fire alarm operates, the respective air handling units of the air­ conditioning system shall automatically be switched off to prevent fire from spreading in the building

AHU should be in sound proof rooms to prevent noise pollution

Building permits and code-compliance inspections of the installations are normally required for all sizes of buildings

Central, 'all-air' air conditioning systems are often installed in modern residences, offices, and public buildings, but are difficult to retrofit (install in a building that was not designed to receive it) because of the bulky air ducts required. A duct system must be carefully maintained to prevent the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the ducts

Accumulation of dust, grease, debris etc. are very common around the AHU, should be cleaned regularly

Inspection at short intervals are needed for AHU installed for ventilations of kitchens in professional use as the components required frequent service, maintenance and changing to avoid fire in such .
Find enclosed an article from EHS Today- a magazine for environmental health & safety;

How the air handling units can easily become toxic...

Thanks & Regards,

Subir Chopra

ARTICLE

Attack of the Toxic Air Handler
There's an old saying about water, shared among health-conscious people: If you are not drinking filtered water, then you are the filter.
Most Popular
3 comments · 6 days ago
1 comment · 1 week ago
Recent

When you apply that proposition to the air circulating through buildings, you may think there's no problem because the air is filtered or cleaned by the building's air handler. But in many cases, that may not be true.

If a building's air handling units have a clogged, leaking or poorly draining condensate pan, this creates the perfect breeding ground for molds, fungi, bacteria and other biological contaminants that circulate continuously within the building's air and the lungs of inhabitants. And if the problem isn't solved, it likely will intensify.

Why are such air contamination problems so widespread in today's buildings and seemingly worsening?

“Since the 1970s, architects have been designing buildings that are more airtight, to help prevent energy leakage,” explains Dan Maser, president of Enviroair Consultants Inc., a provider of industrial and commercial hygiene, safety and environmental services. “And because of that, we're relying totally on the air handling system to bring fresh air into the building. But if the air handling system has a malfunctioning condensate drainage system, it can become the source of biological contamination. Moreover, that unhygienic air may continue circulating, undiluted.”

Maser, a certified industrial hygienist with over 30 years of experience in the fields of environmental, fire protection, industrial hygiene and safety compliance, knows that the likely culprit in such air contamination cases is the air handler's condensate pan or “drip pan” that is supposed to catch condensation moisture released from the air handler. It is vital that the condensate pan provide for proper water drainage. Yet, having conducted many indoor environmental air quality studies and consulting on bioaerosol cases, Maser knows that air handler condensate pans can be poorly designed or inadequately serviced.

Essentially, the molds, fungi and bacteria that plague building air systems requires only three things to propagate: the right temperature range, a source of sufficient nutrients and water. Malfunctioning condensate pans generally meet all three requirements.

“In the presence of stagnant water, the dirt that is normally present in an air handler is a food source for various biological agents, not only molds and fungi, but also strains of bacteria,” says Maser. “And because you have this continuous moisture content, you get unwanted and possibly unhealthy biological growth in the pan, which could eventually cross-contaminate the ductwork and possibly even the filters.”

Maintaining the cleanliness of the system is crucial. A key point is to reduce manual efforts required to help maintain the air quality in the building.

BEYOND MAINTENANCE COSTS

Obviously, the problems with air handlers made toxic by leaking, clogged or malfunctioning condensate pans go far beyond maintenance costs. In addition to that issue come several others, such as business disruption, the reputation of a “sick building,” rental of temporary HVAC equipment and potential for liability for health issues.

Maser points out that Aspergillus is one of the fungi that have been documented to cause issues in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. If Aspergillus is present in the air handling unit, it may further compromise people who are ill or elderly by exposing them to these agents when they are more susceptible to infection. [Note: This is not a reference to the transmitting of communicable diseases in healthcare facilities.]

In addition to allergic reactions and other health issues, a “sick” building caused by air handlers with stagnant water due to leaking or clogged condensate pans can make building inhabitants feel tired or lethargic.
 

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Fwd: Fw: Rameshwar Orchid

srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issue
srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issues
srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issue
srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issue
srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issue
srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issue
srorwa letter dated 10.8.10 to builder on outstanding issue



From: Rajan D Gupta <rajandgupta@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:37:04 +0530
Cc: sharad Narain Singh (M) 9810309952<oa.sharad@gmail.com>; <cmd@starrealcon.com>; <anilsharma@supertechlimited.com>



Subject: Re: Rameshwar Orchid

Dear Mr. Garg

The residents have read your email with lot of interest. However, the residents wish to reiterate their decisions regarding ducting in basement as articulated in our earlier emails. It is really frustrating to observe that despite our written objections to these illegal activities, you and your company are still continuing with the same in residents' basement without even discussing with them which clearly shows that you and your company do not have any regard for the laws of this country. We have already mentioned that you and your company are doing all these illegal actions on residents' properties without taking any permission from the residents. In our civilized society, we regard this as 'goondagardi'; and you are talking about considering residents' interest? How will you feel if the residents intrude your home and install ducts on the ceiling over your head and tell you that we will keep your interest in mind so that you do not have any inconvenience in moving within your house? Please note that we still have rule of law in our country. Are you testing the patience of all residents? As already communicated, the residents will take a decision on this weekend as to how and at what level the matter will be taken up with the District Administration if such trespass is not immediately stopped. The responsibility solely lies with you.

As regards installation of cables and pipes etc catering to residential areas, we have already written to you several times in the past that such lower height has to be corrected by your company which you have never responded to. In any event, since the area belongs to the residents, they are free to allow such installations catering to residential areas and this cannot, in any circumstances, be taken as a license to SML for free use of the area for any other purposes whatsoever. We hereby ask you as to on what basis you want a right to use our basement solely belonging to the residents for any commercial purpose? What charges you and your company propose to pay to RWA for grant of such usage by the residents? What security deposit amount SML is prepared to pay to RWA towards safety of residents' vehicles and damages to the basement as such? What amount of indemnity SML would agree for any loss/damages to be cause to the residents and the entire building arising out of such illegal usage of basement? Please also let us know what amounts you are charging from all commercial occupants for usage of our basement and other residential common areas and how much money SML is making by allowing such usage of the property sold to the residents?

The residents also wish to convey to SML that they have lost all faith and trust in you and your company long back and, hence, please do not make a false statement that SML cares for the interest of residents. This is very clear from the arrogance and the manner in which SML management and staff come across the residents. If SML really cares for residents' interest, then why it never talks to the residents before taking decisions or actions affecting the lives and properties of residents? Can you please show us a single email/correspondence where you/SML on your own have proposed a meeting to resolve any problem being faced by residents?

Regarding the independent issue of maintenance charges, we ourselves had come forward to help SML improve the services and had countless meetings with your management wherein many decisions were taken and your management had agreed (everything is documented) to implement a whole list of long pending items along with transfer of agreed degree of control to RWA based on which it was agreed to consider revision of charges. However, you have cleverly chosen to implement only one decision that is to increase power backup charges from Rs 8 to Rs 12 per unit. On the other hand, your have always very conveniently not even acknowledged so many emails/correspondence reminders sent by RWA on other items leave aside implementation of same. Now you have again unilaterally tried to further increase power back up charges by 70 paise without holding any discussion with the RWA which is unacceptable to the residents for the reasons already explained in our earlier email and we expect you to immediately issue corrected invoices. 

You are also aware that the Ganga Water supply to SRO was disrupted for last 7 months because of metro rail work being carried out by DMRC and the RWA had made repeated requests to the management of your company to get the water supply restored. However, your company, which is solely responsible for the management and maintenance of all water supplies to SRO, did not act at all at any point of time nor did it ever respond to RWA requests in this regard. Ultimately, the residents themselves did all running around and follow up with numerous authorities like DMRC, GNN, GDA, District Administration and GNN Contractor etc for past 3-4 months and got the water supply restored very recently on 11 August 2010. Can we ask what kind of "services" you are providing to us for which you are asking maintenance charges? Further, in the above entire process for restoring water supply, the residents have incurred huge amounts of time costs, resources and money. How do you and your company propose to compensate the residents for such costs incurred by them?

The residents reiterate that in view of all the above reasons payment of maintenance charges to SML without any service is a huge loss to them. The timeline of further 30 days given to SML to correct its way of working is also running out fast.

Independently, we have already informed you that a meeting of all residents of SRO was held few weeks back wherein detailed discussion had taken place inter alia on all issues relating to the countless issues/problems being faced by the residents as well as the issue of revision in maintenance charges. In the above discussion, the residents were of the following views unanimously:

1.      That all residents are absolutely displeased by the fact that you have not addressed/resolved even a single item out of countless matters/complaints referred by RWA/residents from time to time during 4 years.

2.      That the conclusions arrived at by the core committee in its report on joint study are very rational and based on scientific approach and hence the recommendations made therein must be adopted and implemented with immediate effect.

3.     That the residents do not agree to pay for any losses purportedly being incurred by SML owing to its own inefficiencies/deficiencies/theft/defects in its own working systems as the residents do not have any control over the affairs of SML nor do the residents agree to pay for any unnecessary costs (having regard to usual commercial prudence) being incurred by SML which are of no benefit to the residents. 

The residents also wish to state that the rate of maintenance charges of Re. 0.81 per sq ft/pm arrived at in the aforesaid core committee report should be taken as final subject to the following further adjustments:

1.      Deduction on account of interest income being accrued to SML on the present value (after taking into consideration normal FD interest rate of SBI) of the aggregate amount of maintenance security deposits given by all residents at the time of taking possession of their flats. This is for the reason that we are now discussing revision of the maintenance agreement.

2.      Deduction on account of justified allocation of all revenues being generated by SML/Supertech from all advertisements/billboards/signboards displayed at all areas (including rooftop) of the SRO residential complex.

3.      Deduction on account of charges/costs at mutually agreeable rates in respect of usage of common/other areas of SRO residential complex for all installations/facilities/other usages catering to commercial complex/mall and Yashoda Hospital.

4.      Addition of 10% on the final rate as arrived at above towards SML management charges and other costs etc.

We have also delivered a detailed letter dated 10 August 2010 to your staff at SRO. A scanned copy of the acknowledged letter is attached with this email. The residents expect immediate action of SML on the points raised in the attached letter.

Thanks



Rajan D Gupta
General Secretary - SRO RWA



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Nkgarg <nkgarg@starindia.asia> wrote:
Sir,

With reference to your mail regarding ducting in the basement of the complex, we like to inform you that
the services of the apartment is also running through the basement at many places on 6".10' heights therefore
it is not possible for us to maintain 8" height at all level in the basement and we are trying our best to maintain
minimum 7" height of ducting so that resident can park their vehicle without any hindrance. We are always with
the society members and their interest will always be considered.

We further like to draw your kind attention towards the cost of maintenance of the society. We are submitting our
details of monthly expenditure in each meeting but till date no conclusion has been arrived. We are regularly
incurring heavy losses every month and in spite that society members are not satisfied with services of service provider's.

The Company has its own limitation and It is not possible for the company to bear huge losses every month. Therefore
please consider our request and take some action in this regard. We request you to please plan the total monthly budget
of the expenses of the society and accordingly decide the ideal cost of maintenance. We are ready to cooperate
you in all manner but please also consider our losses.


Thanks & Regards

For Surya Merchants Ltd.
N.K.Garg