Thursday, June 24, 2010

Fwd: non attendance maintenance complaints:reduction in maintenanceto Rs.0.40 per sqft from 01 jun10



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rajan D Gupta <rajan.gupta@srgrlaw.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: non attendance maintenance complaints:reduction in maintenanceto Rs.0.40 per sqft from 01 jun10
To: krishan mukhija <kkmukhija@yahoo.co.in>, 7ashutosh@indiatimes.com, harish khosla <khoslaharish@gmail.com>
Cc: Shanti Swaroop <sswaroop802@yahoo.in>, srorwa@gmail.com, sachinrastogi999@rediffmail.com, abhinav kumar1978 <abhinav.kumar1978@gmail.com>, anuragrungta@gmail.com, "J. P. Aggarwal" <jai_utsav@yahoo.com>, byanktesh@gmail.com, choprasubir@gmail.com, Nand Chopra <nand.chopra@ril.com>, Deepa Mathur <deepaguriya@yahoo.co.in>, "J. D. Mangla" <jdmangla@yahoo.com>, S Dubey <sdubey@vimalplasticindia.com>, gunjansaini@gmail.com, Mahabir Gupta <mahabirgupta2004@rediffmail.com>, Naveen Gupta <naveen_gupta22004@yahoo.co.in>, "R. K. Gupta" <sakhibeauty@yahoo.com>, Rajat Jain <rajatjain70@hotmail.com>, Mohit Rostogi <mohit_ele@yahoo.com>


Dear Mukhija Ji

 

The core committee is in advisory capacity only and the final decision / action has to be taken by the RWA/Residents collectively. This position has been very clear also from the deliberations that took place in last GBM as also in residents' meeting held prior to this GBM. The committee had prepared the draft letter attached. The committee had recommended to RWA that the last paragraph of this draft may be suitably modified (as per the decision of the RWA/all residents) and then the letter be sent to the builder. Please count me in for the ensuing litigation. The said recommendation stands subject to residents' approval. Also, we recommend that all actions /communications addressing the builder should be in writing apart from other actions/communications.

 

Further, your email should not have been copied to NK Garg of SML which has the effect of weakening our position. I think it happened inadvertently.

 

Thanks & Regards

Rajan


From: krishan mukhija [mailto:kkmukhija@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: 25 June 2010 11:54
To: 7ashutosh@indiatimes.com; harish khosla
Cc: Shanti Swaroop; srorwa@gmail.com; sachinrastogi999@rediffmail.com; abhinav kumar1978; anuragrungta@gmail.com; J. P. Aggarwal; byanktesh@gmail.com; choprasubir@gmail.com; Nand Chopra; Deepa Mathur; J. D. Mangla; Rajan D Gupta; S Dubey; gunjansaini@gmail.com; Mahabir Gupta; Nand Garg || Star Realcon; Naveen Gupta; R. K. Gupta; Rajat Jain; Mohit Rostogi


Subject: Re: non attendance maintenance complaints:reduction in maintenanceto Rs.0.40 per sqft from 01 jun10

 

Mr. Sawroop,

 

JO TAN LAGE SO TAN JANE

 

This is not only u but all. Who carers ? Why this issue is being raised now? maintenance committee is to take up all this issue . why this committee is not taking note of it and doing something ? My suggestion is to call for the meeting of body to decide fighter course of Acton if you are really want to do something .Or accept the suggestion given by Mr Sinha that merely sending mails would not do anything.

K.K Mukhija
Advocate
+919810387379

--- On Fri, 25/6/10, harish khosla <khoslaharish@gmail.com> wrote:


From: harish khosla <khoslaharish@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: non attendance maintenance complaints:reduction in maintenanceto Rs.0.40 per sqft from 01 jun10
To: 7ashutosh@indiatimes.com
Cc: "Shanti Swaroop" <sswaroop802@yahoo.in>, srorwa@gmail.com, sachinrastogi999@rediffmail.com, "abhinav kumar1978" <abhinav.kumar1978@gmail.com>, anuragrungta@gmail.com, "J. P. Aggarwal" <jai_utsav@yahoo.com>, byanktesh@gmail.com, choprasubir@gmail.com, "Nand Chopra" <nand.chopra@ril.com>, "Deepa Mathur" <deepaguriya@yahoo.co.in>, "J. D. Mangla" <jdmangla@yahoo.com>, "Rajan D Gupta" <rajan.gupta@srgrlaw.com>, "S Dubey" <sdubey@vimalplasticindia.com>, gunjansaini@gmail.com, "Mahabir Gupta" <mahabirgupta2004@rediffmail.com>, "Nand Garg || Star Realcon" <nkgarg@starrealcon.com>, "Naveen Gupta" <naveen_gupta22004@yahoo.co.in>, "R. K. Gupta" <sakhibeauty@yahoo.com>, "Rajat Jain" <rajatjain70@hotmail.com>, "Krishan Mukhija" <kkmukhija@yahoo.co.in>, "Mohit Rostogi" <mohit_ele@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, 25 June, 2010, 10:48 AM

Dear All,

Why even 0.40 paise.

The services provided are not even worth a penny .

I think we should stick to the resolution passed in the GBM that we should stop maintainence till all pending issues are resolved

 

Harish Khosla

 

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:29 PM, <7ashutosh@indiatimes.com> wrote:

We all know about the pathetic response time ( if at all response is given ) by the builder. As conveyed in GBM, there is nothing which builder is providing as service. Carpenter has not come for months together, security is in shambles, complaints are attended ( if at all ) as per convenience of the builder.

I share concerns of Mr. Shanti Swaroop and I am in agreement with him that we should ask builder to come down to a cost of Rs. 0.40 rate immediately.

Further, not all of us are as diligent as Mr. Shanti Swaroop who has kept record of the complaints.

Many a times complaint made to maintenance office are not even logged in the complaint register. I would suggest that we should start a complaint log in SRORwa web site and let builder take a print of it every day and once complaint is resolved he should get it signed from resident. Let builder pay for any charges which are incurred in developing and maintaining it on web site. This would take care of smartness of maintenance staff and further they would not be able to say that last complaint register is lost ( as they have said quite a few times.

regards,

Ashutosh





----- Original Message -----
From: Shanti Swaroop <sswaroop802@yahoo.in>
To: srorwa@gmail.com
Cc: sachinrastogi999@rediffmail.com, abhinav kumar1978 <abhinav.kumar1978@gmail.com>, anuragrungta@gmail.com, Ashutosh Gupta <7ashutosh@indiatimes.com>, Ashutosh Gupta <7ashutosh@indiatimes.com>, J. P. Aggarwal <jai_utsav@yahoo.com>, byanktesh@gmail.com, choprasubir@gmail.com, Nand Chopra <nand.chopra@ril.com>, Deepa Mathur <deepaguriya@yahoo.co.in>, J. D. Mangla <jdmangla@yahoo.com>, Rajan D Gupta <rajan.gupta@srgrlaw.com>, S Dubey <sdubey@vimalplasticindia.com>, gunjansaini@gmail.com, Ashutosh Gupta <7ashutosh@indiatimes.com>, Mahabir Gupta <mahabirgupta2004@rediffmail.com>, Nand Garg || Star Realcon <nkgarg@starrealcon.com>, Naveen Gupta <naveen_gupta22004@yahoo.co.in>, R. K. Gupta <sakhibeauty@yahoo.com>, Harish Khosla <khoslaharish@gmail.com>, Rajat Jain <rajatjain70@hotmail.com>, Krishan Mukhija <kkmukhija@yahoo.co.in>, Mohit Rostogi <mohit_ele@yahoo.com>, Naveen Gupta <naveen_gupta22004@yahoo.co.in>, O. N. Srivastava <onsrivastava52@gmail.com>, Naveen Gupta <naveen_gupta22004@yahoo.co.in>, oc601@srorwa.org, Sharad Singh <oa.sharad@gmail.com>, rajesh saini <rajesh.saini@lycos.com>, R Takkar <rtakkar@indianoil.co.in>, sachinrastogi999@rediffmail.com, sheshadribose@yahoo.co.in, Pradeep Sant <pradeep.sant@yahoo.co.in>, R Takkar <rtakkar@indianoil.co.in>
Sent: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:13:35 +0530 (IST)
Subject: non attendance maintenance complaints:reduction in maintenance to Rs.0.40 per sqft from 01 jun10

M/s Surya Merchants Ltd. wants to increase the Maintenance charges but COMPLAINTS are not being intendingProperly. So we must consider reducing the maintenance.  
 
It is submitted for the information of all residents that I had spent Rs.3.25 Lac. For renovation of my flat No 802-OA during 2008. Prior to this, I had requested M/s SML/ M/s Supertech Rameshwar Orchids to appoint Arbitrator as per agreement to sell. They remained silent then I requested to inspect the site JOINTLY but they remained silent. Owing to their silent, I had lodged Court Case in Hon,ble Consumer Redressal Forum GZB
 
Now M/s SML is stressing to increase the maintenance charges where as they are not looking the complaints of defects properly. Instances are appended below:- 
Seepage appeared in my flat and  complaints for painting patch works, were made on  18-09-2009, 13-10-2009, 21-11-2009, 25-12-2009, 06-01-2010, 19-01-2010 and 27-01-2010,6-02-2010,14-02-2010,27-02-2010.   Mr. Lalit Sharma have physically checked the site on 02 Jan 10 and directed Mr. Kali Charan to complete the job.  But the job has not yet been carried out completely. On 12-03-2010 a  complaint was also made and a painter was provided who left after doing some works. On 11-04-2010 again a complaint MADE  and a painter was provided who too left after doing work in bed room only. He took Rs.40/- from me for purchase of colour and shade applied on the wall of master bed room  does not tally with the existing shade. Balance works have not yet been carried out. 
 
Besides complaint for mason ( for patchwork 10"x2"plastering )and carpenter ( for adjustment of modeler kitchen accessories ) were lodged on 12 Jun 2010. Even these works were told to Mr. Kali charan who promised to do these works with in 2 days but no progress as yet.
 
More so the Std of domestic water is not good. Builder has just got bore-well diged near to old bore well and  not bothered to install filter.
 
For RWA only :- please take up the matter with builder on priority. It may please be noted that our complex is in very pathetic condition at present. Besides M/s SML wants to increased the maintenance charges where as maintenance condition has gone from BAD TO WORST. Please ask BUILDER to start recovering  Rs.0.40 per sqft only from 01 Jun 2010.
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                          Shanti Swaroop
                                                                                                     OA-802



--
Click for exclusive coverage on the New Bajaj Pulsar 220 the fastest Indian bike
http://www.zigwheels.com/Features/Bajaj-Pulsar-220-DTSi-Special-Coverage/Pulsar_20090623-1-1

 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment